With that being the case, I’d still probably recommend the original over the remake, but I definitely wouldn’t dissuade anyone from seeing it. I really enjoy the original, but the remake does have some good moments as well.
#Insomnia film light and dark 1997 movie
The movie is fine, I guess, but in the same way that Soderberg's Solaris is fine but unnecessary and not particularly interesting. Insomnia is one of those odd movies where the remake stands on some of its own merits. Williams had just received a lot of praise for playing a psychopath in One Hour Photo and this film seemed to confirm a full phase in his career of approaching dark material. The editing has an ethereal feel to it as Jonas starts to sleepwalk through his life and drifts in and out of essentially reality while he tries to keep it together. The movie also plays not only with the visual of always being light, but the problems of insomnia. You also have characters like Gisken Armand’s officer who is also a good detective, but finds herself behind the eight-ball due to Jonas’ tampering with the case. Like It and Dreamcatcher, the story is set in the. It follows retired widower Ralph Roberts whose increasing insomnia allows him to perceive auras and other hidden things, leading him to join a conflict between the forces of the Purpose and the Random. Stellan Skarsgård portrays a genuinely good detective who cannot confess to his error and it ends up paying for it. Insomnia is a 1994 horror / fantasy novel by American writer Stephen King. You don’t know the extent of Bjørn Floberg’s mental instability so he is the only real wild card in that theory…you have to take his word that everything that happened in the death of Tanja was an accident. The movie (unlike the remake) has none of the characters really being awful. Well…this investigation isn’t going as I hoped…
0 kommentar(er)
